Record an invoice payment with Alfie without marking the wrong balance as paid
Choose between recording a transaction and closing an invoice, then review amount, date, reference and remaining balance.
“Mark this paid” can describe several financial events: a full bank receipt, a partial payment, a netted credit note or a manual status correction. Alfie's current inventory separates recording an invoice payment from marking an invoice paid. Enfin supplies the invoice ledger, permissions and audit history needed to choose the correct action instead of treating the phrase as a status shortcut.
Identify the invoice and evidence
Start with invoice number, customer, amount and currency. Match the bank reference or other evidence to the same legal customer and check whether the document is still active. Similar amounts across projects are not enough to establish a match.
If the evidence covers several invoices, allocate each part explicitly. If it is a deposit or unidentified transfer, hold it for review rather than forcing it onto the oldest open item.
Choose the accounting event
Record a payment when an amount, date and payment reference need to be stored against the invoice. Mark paid only when the remaining balance is genuinely zero under the company's rules. Partial payments should leave a visible residual balance; credit notes and write-offs follow their own controlled path.
Keep bank settlement, invoice status and customer communication separate. A customer saying that payment was sent is useful context, but it is not the same evidence as a settled transaction.
Review Alfie's proposed action
The preview should display the invoice, current balance, proposed amount, date, method, reference and resulting balance. Resolve rounding, currency or duplicate-payment warnings before execution. If the user request is ambiguous, Alfie should ask whether to record a transaction or close the invoice.
The model helps interpret the instruction while Enfin enforces organisation access and writes the financial event. This is governed execution, not autonomous reconciliation.
Close the operational follow-up
After the record is saved, update only the reminders and dashboards affected by the new balance. Preserve the original payment evidence and the user who confirmed the action. If a residual amount remains, give it a clear owner rather than leaving a misleading paid label.
Compare this workflow with changing an invoice due date through Alfie. Explore Alfie and Enfin for the controlled finance context.
Final project check. Before closing this workflow, review three layers. Is the source correct: the right project, customer or supplier and the current document version? Is the decision explicit: who has authority, which exception remains open and who owns the next step? Finally, does execution match the intent: which fields change, what evidence remains and who is notified? For “record invoice payment vs mark paid construction”, another colleague should be able to reconstruct the reason without searching the full WhatsApp conversation or mailbox.
Keep a short exception list for missing data, uncertain record matches and unconfirmed assumptions. Do not bury those points in free text. After several cases, assess whether duplicate entry falls and errors surface earlier, without claiming savings the company has not measured. This keeps the workflow useful and controlled, consistent with how Enfin organises construction administration.
Declaration of Works for concrete suppliers: record the branch without falsifying the subcontractor chain
Belgium's Declaration of Works process recognises a practical problem in ready-mixed concrete deliveries: the exact delivery subcontractor may not be known…
Create a supplier with Alfie after checking company and payment identity
Verify legal name, company number, address, contact and payment terms before a new supplier enters construction purchasing.
Missing a structured Peppol invoice: protect VAT deduction evidence without inventing compliance
Handle a missing Belgian structured B2B invoice with a documented correction path, VAT evidence review and no unsupported compliance assumptions.